One composite. Four distinct dimensions.
The EVO Score doesn't collapse performance into a single vague number. It exposes four specific dimensions — each with its own sub-scores and trajectory over time.
First-touch accuracy, pass precision, execution success rate under fatigue. The fundamental skillset, measured without bias.
Decision latency measured in milliseconds. Pattern recognition speed. Dual-task performance. The 0.3 seconds that decide matches.
Movement efficiency, output per phase, recovery between reps. Not raw athleticism — efficient output relative to the task.
Peripheral awareness, spatial processing, anticipatory accuracy. The dimension most coaching systems ignore entirely.
Thirty to forty-five minutes. A prescription that lasts four to six weeks.
The EVO Score session is not a training session with tracking bolted on. It is a measurement event. Training is the by-product.
Tests A through E each target a specific pillar combination. The sequence is automated — the Arena's software controls stimulus timing, ball delivery, and sensor capture. No human observer introduces subjectivity.
The output is a PDF-ready scorecard plus a structured prescription. The prescription maps specific protocol recommendations to each sub-score. The athlete leaves knowing exactly what to train next and why.
Five performance bands. One honest scale.
The bands are calibrated against the global network. A score of 75 means the same thing in Lisbon as it does in Lagos.
Foundation
Building the base. Technical fundamentals require focused repetition. Cognitive load protocols are introductory. Prescription prioritises stability and clean execution.
Developing
Patterns are forming. Decision speed is improving but inconsistent under load. Technical precision varies with fatigue. Prescription targets consistency over peak output.
Performing
Reliable execution at moderate load. Decision latency within competitive range. This is the band where most committed athletes plateau without structured intervention.
Advanced
Performance is consistent under high cognitive load. Technical execution rate stays above 80% in the final phases. Marginal gains require precision prescription.
Elite
Statistical rarety. The top of the global distribution. Maintenance protocols take precedence. Data at this band contributes significantly to benchmark calibration.
Three tiers. One standard.
The EVO Score isn't just a player metric. It's the foundation for a club's certified development infrastructure.
Standard
Access to EVO Score assessments. Club-branded scorecards. Session data stored and trended over time. Foundation for every development program.
Club licensing details →EPIC-Certified
EPIC-validated assessment protocol. Club appears in the certified network directory. Players can reference the certification in recruitment contexts. Methodology is audited annually.
Book a discovery session →Network
Full data network access. Cross-club benchmarking. Talent identification pipeline. Anonymised player data from across the global network, filtered by position, age group, and EVO band.
Network partner inquiry →The EVO Score and the App's SAC are distinct frameworks.
The EVO Score is generated by the Arena — in-person, hardware-based, four pillars, 0–100. The SAC (Speed / Accuracy / Consistency) is the App's self-assessment framework — digital, anywhere, three dimensions, EEI 0–100. They are not the same. They are not interchangeable. We are explicit about this because conflating them would undermine the integrity of both.
SEE THE FULL COMPARISON →Book a discovery session. See the Arena live.
Forty-five minutes. The ROI model. A live demonstration of the EVO Score output.